Pittsburgh Logo
File #: 2003-1421    Version: 1
Type: Ordinance Status: Passed Finally
File created: 2/4/2003 In control: Committee on Finance & Budget
On agenda: Final action: 2/25/2003
Enactment date: 3/25/2003 Enactment #: 5
Effective date: 3/10/2003    
Title: An Ordinance amending the Pittsburgh Code, Title Two, "Fiscal", Article IX, "Property Taxes", Chapter 261, "Personal Property Tax", by eliminating for the tax years 1993 and 1994 an exemption on certain shares of stock which was determined to be unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Indexes: PGH. CODE ORDINANCES TITLE 02 - FISCAL
Presenter
Presented by Mr. Udin

Title
An Ordinance amending the Pittsburgh Code, Title Two, "Fiscal", Article IX, "Property Taxes", Chapter 261, "Personal Property Tax", by eliminating for the tax years 1993 and 1994 an exemption on certain shares of stock which was determined to be unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Body
Whereas, in 1996, Walter and Leonore Annenberg, taxpayers in Montgomery County, Pennsylvania, challenged the constitutionally of the personal property tax levied pursuant to Section 4821 of the Act of June 17, 1913, P.L. 507, as amended, 72 P.S. § 4821 (the "personal property tax statute"); and

Whereas, at the time the Montgomery County action was filed, the City of Pittsburgh, the School District of Pittsburgh (School District) and the County of Allegheny (the County) had repealed their personal property taxes effective January 1, 1995, as required by Act 77 of 1993, 16 P.S. § 6171-B (a) (2); and

Whereas, by a decision dated June 1, 2000, in the case of Annenberg v. Commonwealth, 562 Pa. 581, 757 A.2d 338 (2000), the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania held that a provision of the personal property tax statute which exempted from taxation stocks of companies doing business in Pennsylvania was unconstitutional because it discriminated against interstate commerce; and

Whereas, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ordered all taxing jurisdictions which had collected a personal property tax with the unconstitutional exemption to devise a remedy that would eliminate what the Court determined to be illegal discrimination under the law in favor of stocks issued by companies doing business in Pennsylvania; and

Whereas, pursuant to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court directives in Annenberg, possible remedies could include the re-imposition of the personal property tax for the years 1993-1994 to collect taxes on the previously exempt stocks, or the refund of all personal property taxes collected for those years, or so...

Click here for full text